The Foundations of Interpretation

This subject is not offered in 2014.

An average of 8.5 hours each week

None.

None.

At least 12.5 points (one subject) in either philosophy or European studies.

None

For the purposes of considering request for Reasonable Adjustments under the disability Standards for Education (Cwth 2005), and Students Experiencing Academic Disadvantage Policy, academic requirements for this subject are articulated in the Subject Description, Subject Objectives, Generic Skills and Assessment Requirements of this entry.The University is dedicated to provide support to those with special requirements. Further details on the disability support scheme can be found at the Disability Liaison Unit website: http://www.services.unimelb.edu.au/disability/

This subject explores the theories of meaning and interpretation developed in contemporary European thought. We will examine questions such as: How do we make sense of texts from other cultures and times? What is it to interpret a text? Is the meaning of a text determined by the author's intentions? Does what we write or say have a single determinate meaning or can conflicting interpretations be equally valid? Major thinkers discussed will be chosen from Heidegger, Gadamer, Habermas, Ricoeur, Derrida, Butler and Benjamin. On completion of this subject students should have broad grasp of a variety of competing theories and understand what would be involved in applying them to a critical reading of texts. They should also have a greater awareness of the assumptions that are reinforced or challenged by different reading practices.

Students who successfully complete this subject will:

• have a general knowledge of some central themes in contemporary European philosophy.
• understand how those themes arose from and critically relate to earlier philosophical theories.
• be able to apply the methods and theses advanced in contemporary European philosophical texts to current issues and problems.
• be able to clearly explicate and explain the central themes and theses discussed in the subject.
• demonstrate an ability to critically examine philosophical arguments and theses.
• acquire an ability to uncover the presuppositions at work in a text.
• acquire an appreciation of the factors which govern interpretations of a text.

A written assignment of 2000 words 50% (due mid-semester), a take-home written examination of 2000 words 50% (due during the first week of the end of semester examination period).

This subject has a minimum hurdle requirement of 75% tutorial attendance. Regular participation in tutorials is required. Assessment submitted late without an approved extension will be penalised at 10% per day. After 5 working days late assessment will not be marked. In-class tasks missed without approval will not be marked. All pieces of written work must be submitted to pass this subject.

Readings will be available online

This subject potentially can be taken as a breadth subject component for the following courses:

• Bachelor of Biomedicine
• Bachelor of Commerce
• Bachelor of Environments
• Bachelor of Music
• Bachelor of Science
• Bachelor of Engineering

You should visit learn more about breadth subjects and read the breadth requirements for your degree, and should discuss your choice with your student adviser, before deciding on your subjects.

Students who successfully complete this subject will:

• develop skills in critical thinking and analysis.
• have improved their ability to think creatively.
• develop skills in written communication.