Judicial Power in Australia

This subject has the following teaching availabilities in 2013:

Applicants without legal qualifications should note that subjects are offered in the discipline of law at an advanced graduate level. While every effort will be made to meet the needs of students trained in other fields, concessions will not be made in the general level of instruction or assessment. Most subjects assume the knowledge usually acquired in a degree in law (LLB, JD or equivalent). Applicants should note that admission to some subjects in the Melbourne Law Masters will be dependent upon the individual applicant’s educational background and professional experience.

The Melbourne Law Masters welcomes applications from students with disabilities. The inherent academic requirements for study in the Melbourne Law Masters are:

• The ability to attend a minimum of 75% of classes and actively engage in the analysis and critique of complex materials and debate;
• The ability to read, analyse and comprehend complex written legal materials and complex interdisciplinary materials;
• The ability to clearly and independently communicate in writing a knowledge and application of legal principles and interdisciplinary materials and to critically evaluate these;
• The ability to clearly and independently communicate orally a knowledge and application of legal principles and interdisciplinary materials and critically evaluate these;
• The ability to work independently and as a part of a group;
• The ability to present orally and in writing legal analysis to a professional standard.

Students who feel their disability will inhibit them from meeting these inherent academic requirements are encouraged to contact the Disability Liaison Unit: www.services.unimelb.edu.au/disability/

This subject will explain and critically analyse the principles relating to the exercise of judicial power by federal, state and territory courts. We will start with the fundamental requirements that federal courts may only exercise judicial power, and federal judicial power may only be exercised by certain types of courts. Where is the boundary between judicial and non-judicial power? What is the doctrinal basis for and likely future of the exceptions? What is the boundary between federal and state judicial power? We will consider aspects of the High Court’s original and appellate jurisdictions. We will then turn to the essential characteristics of state courts, the exercise of federal jurisdiction by state courts, and the recent line of High Court cases striking down laws that detract from the institutional integrity and independence of state courts. Lastly, we will consider the rules of precedent that operate in an ‘integrated’ judicial system. Both instructors regularly advise the Commonwealth and state governments concerning constitutional matters, and appear in the High Court in such matters.

Principal topics will include:

• The meaning of ‘judicial power’
• Separation of powers under the Commonwealth Constitution – the propositions that federal courts may only exercise judicial power, and federal judicial power may only be exercised by Chapter III courts
• The chameleon principle
• Power incidental to judicial power
• The ‘persona designata’ exception, and the concept of functions that are incompatible with the exercise of judicial power
• Case studies – The Takeovers Panel (Alinta), and the power to make terrorism control orders (Thomas v Mowbray)
• Aspects of the High Court’s original and appellate jurisdictions
• The exercise of federal jurisdiction by state courts, and accrued jurisdiction by federal courts
• The protection of state courts under the Commonwealth Constitution – Kable and recent cases developing or reformulating the Kable principle; also, Kirk
• Territories and judicial power
• Precedent in an ‘integrated’ judicial system.

A student who has successfully completed this subject will:

• Have a good understanding of the principles relating to the separation of federal judicial power
• Be able to analyse critically the exceptions to the separation of powers principles
• Be able to advise on how the separation of powers principles are likely to apply in a practical litigation context
• Have a good understanding of the emerging constitutional protections applicable to State courts and likely future developments in this area
• Have a firm grasp of how federal jurisdiction is applied by State courts, and the extent of the accrued jurisdiction of federal courts
• Be familiar with the heads of original and appellate jurisdiction of the High Court
• Understand and be able to analyse critically the rules of precedent applicable to State and federal courts operating within an ‘integrated’ judicial system.

Take-home examination (100%) (5–8 July)
or
10,000 word research paper (100%) (28 August) on a topic approved by the subject coordinator

Core subject materials will be provided free of charge to all students. Some subjects require further texts to be purchased. Visit the Melbourne Law Masters website for more information about this subject.

This subject is not available as a breadth subject.