The Dialogic Imagination in Context

This subject is not offered in 2013.

120

Admission to the postgraduate certificate, postgraduate diploma, or fourth year honours in creative writing; or the Master of Creative Writing, Publishing and Editing.

None

None

For the purposes of considering request for Reasonable Adjustments under the disability Standards for Education (Cwth 2005), and Students Experiencing Academic Disadvantage Policy, academic requirements for this subject are articulated in the Subject Description, Subject Objectives, Generic Skills and Assessment Requirements of this entry.

The University is dedicated to provide support to those with special requirements. Further details on the disability support scheme can be found at the Disability Liaison Unit website: http://www.services.unimelb.edu.au/disability/

This subject will introduce students to advanced dialogic techniques in relation to a range of genres including short story, novel and script.

The exploration of the mechanics of dialogue will be cast against the historical evolution of modern and postmodern modes of dialogue so that students will also understand how dialogue has been shaped by genre and the socio-political and cultural contexts from which key genres have arisen. For assessment, students will develop practical work comprising a short script, a full-length short story or a series of ‘short’ short stories. They will also produce a comparative critique of modes of dialogue used by authors included in the subject reader. They will workshop their creative project, participate in improvisational exercises, and provide written and verbal editorial feedback to fellow students.

Students who complete this subject should be able to:

• demonstrate a range of dialogue skills and apprehension of dialogue writing conventions applicable to a range of professional creative writing genres;
• demonstrate an advanced ability to solve problems in the field of dialogue driven writing genres and apply new skills to their creative work;
• demonstrate an understanding of histories of written dialogue and how 'dialogic work' carries on a continual dialogue with other works of literature and other authors; and
• demonstrate not just a 'wonderful ear for dialogue' but a wonderful mind for dialogue.

Comparative critique of two writers working in the same genre, 1500 words 20% (due mid-semester); class paper equivalent to 500 words 10% (due during the semester); creative work of either short fiction or script 3000 words 70% (due in the examination period). Students are required to attend a minimum of 80% (or 10 out of 12) classes in order to qualify to have their written work assessed. Any student who fails to meet this hurdle without valid reason will not be eligible to pass the subject. All required written work must be submitted in order to pass the subject. Essays submitted after the due date without an extension will be penalised 2% per day. Essays submitted after two weeks of the assessment due date without a formally approved application for special consideration or an extension will only be marked on a pass/fail basis if accepted.

A subject reader will be available.

• P Morris (ed), The Bakhtin Reader: Selected Writings of Bakhtin, Medvedev, Voloshnikov, Edward Arnold, 1994.
• H Smith, The Writing Experiment, Allen & Unwin, 2001.

• J Wood, How Fiction Works, Farrar Strauss and Giroux, 2008.
• J Wood, The Irresponsible Self: On Laughter and the Novel, Farrar Strauss and Giroux, 2004.
• J Freeman, New Performance/new writing, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.

This subject is not available as a breadth subject.

Students who successfully complete this subject will:

• have acquired a capacity for critical analysis through engagement and critique of a range of creative writing genres;
• demonstrate advanced skills in peer workshopping and self-editing;
• demonstrate a capacity to work consistently and independently at an advanced level on a self-devised project;
• demonstrate a capacity to participate in a project requiring team-work and contributions to the progress of others; and
• demonstrate advanced skills in peer workshopping and self-editing.