Great Thinkers in Moral Philosophy
Subject 672-334 (2009)
Note: This is an archived Handbook entry from 2009. Search for this in the current handbook
Credit Points: | 12.50 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Level: | 3 (Undergraduate) | ||||||||||||
Dates & Locations: | This subject has the following teaching availabilities in 2009: Semester 1, - Taught on campus.
Timetable can be viewed here. For information about these dates, click here. | ||||||||||||
Time Commitment: | Contact Hours: Thirty-two contact hours per semester; two 1-hour lectures per week for the first 11 weeks and a 1-hour tutorial per week beginning the third week of semester Total Time Commitment: 3 contact hours/week, 6 additional hours/week. Total of 9 hours per week. | ||||||||||||
Prerequisites: | At least one first-year single-semester philosophy subject, or permission from the Head of School or subject coordinator. | ||||||||||||
Corequisites: | None | ||||||||||||
Recommended Background Knowledge: | None | ||||||||||||
Non Allowed Subjects: | None | ||||||||||||
Core Participation Requirements: |
For the purposes of considering request for Reasonable Adjustments under the Disability Standards for Education (Cwth 2005), and Student Support and Engagement Policy, academic requirements for this subject are articulated in the Subject Overview, Learning Outcomes, Assessment and Generic Skills sections of this entry. It is University policy to take all reasonable steps to minimise the impact of disability upon academic study, and reasonable adjustments will be made to enhance a student's participation in the University's programs. Students who feel their disability may impact on meeting the requirements of this subject are encouraged to discuss this matter with a Faculty Student Adviser and Student Equity and Disability Support: http://services.unimelb.edu.au/disability |
Coordinator
Dr Simon Tait KellerContact
Dr Douglas Adeney
douglasa@unimelb.edu.au
Subject Overview: | This subject critically studies three classics of moral philosophy: Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, Immanuel Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, and John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism. These works represent very different approaches, and advance some celebrated doctrines. Aristotle holds that moral virtue is a mean between extremes, and that well-being, eudaimonia, is 'an activity of the soul in accordance with virtue'; Kant argues that an act has moral worth only if it is performed from the motive of duty, and that a person should be treated 'never simply as a means, but always at the same time as an end'; Mill holds that the 'Greatest Happiness Principle' should be our fundamental ethical guide, and that happiness is pleasure, but adds that some pleasures are worthier than others and that it is 'better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied'. |
---|---|
Objectives: |
|
Assessment: | A written assignment of 2000 words 50% (due mid-semester), a 2-hour closed-book written examination 47% (held at the end of semester) and tutorial participation 3%. |
Prescribed Texts: | Any edition of the three texts named above. A booklet of Supplementary Readings will also be made available. |
Breadth Options: | This subject potentially can be taken as a breadth subject component for the following courses:
You should visit learn more about breadth subjects and read the breadth requirements for your degree, and should discuss your choice with your student adviser, before deciding on your subjects. |
Fees Information: | Subject EFTSL, Level, Discipline & Census Date |
Generic Skills: |
|
Related Majors/Minors/Specialisations: |
European Studies Philosophy Philosophy Major |
Download PDF version.